|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:12:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Marcus TheMartin on 19/01/2007 16:08:25 I've tried making this point so many times but every cloak junkie likes to respond simply with "good thats what they are meant to do blah blah"
Or at least get rid of local so I don't know they are there
 DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:27:00 -
[2]
You guys don't get it every thing in eve can be countered but virtually nothing can counter the cloaked spy. Lets say hes in a small ship with a helios sitting outside of the station at 60km watching you. The only way to find him is to get within 2500m so he decloaks and even before you can get that close he could warp off and you'd never know about it. The only way to catch him would be to have a fleet of dominixes and carriers exit the station each taking a different angle to approach the distance of 60km from while releasing thier drones to decloak him. That is a hell of an effort to find one helios. lets not even discuss finding him in a safe spot. all I want is a countermeasure against the cloak spy DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:43:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Andargor theWise Edited by: Andargor theWise on 19/01/2007 16:25:31
Originally by: Marcus TheMartin
I've tried making this point so many times but every cloak junkie likes to respond simply with "good thats what they are meant to do blah blah"
Originally by: ghoststalkertr
They are meant to cloak and spy, yes i agree with that.
Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker
This is what cloaking where made for.
Originally by: Aurel Senia
its a cloak, its SUPPOSED to make you invisible.
Originally by: Vizranuh
this is what it's supposed to be used for!

Marcus, your future-fu is strong. Are you available for palm readings?
I am sure powerful alliance leaders would like to retain your services to predict how the geopolitical landscape will change in the next few months. Trade tycoons as well!.
Marcus, you are my friend.
 
Not so much a psychic as I am aware of the cookie cutter arguments used against various things Ex: Cloaks = No they are working as intended, Local = No we hate pirats, Logoffski = No we hate bubbles/honor jibba jabba/I ain't givin you **** jibba jabba DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:44:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Aelena Thraant Yes cloaks need a counter.... I agree... Maybe a special scan prob that takes 20 minutes or so and has like a 1 au range. Not perfect but a counter.
Now your situation is counterable. Have scouts in surrounding systems to make sure there isn't a gang to gank someone ratting... If it's a force recon... I would suggest ratting in groups.
A long time ago my corporation was camped with a Carrier with a cloak and a Force Recon or 2. We just learned to adapt and it gave us some tactics that we used later. 
IMO Non Covert ops cloak should somehow should disengage after a set amount of time. That way if people are there then they can just recloak if they arn't then out goes the scan probes.
They could make a hot pocket and warp around in the time it takes to get them probed out DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:45:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Eriv Kendri Its the afk nature of the cloaker thats most annoying - perhaps you should be kicked from the server if you are afk for more than a certain time. That way someone has to be at least attendent.
I like that too it would clear up alot of systems to be honest  DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 16:53:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Marcus TheMartin on 19/01/2007 16:50:06
Originally by: Rod Blaine So, you've got a single claoked alt sitting in your system....
And that's an issue because of what exactly ?
You don't feel safe ? OMG ! The answer is called puttin-an-alt/scout-of-your-own-in-nextdoor-systems-and-letting-all-friendlies-know-when-to-run-for-cover
Ofc, you could also try to set a trap for him and his friends if the prior tactic doesn't help for some reason. I bet they wouldn't expect to scramble a single bs in a belt only to be jumped by a dozen others from a safespot 15 au away.
Its not that he's there its the fact that he is there and your odds of being able to do something about it are one in a trillion DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 17:48:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sean Dillon If they cloak they can't kill you, so whats the problem exactly?
He's just monitoring your activity and report to enemy, why dont you do the same with your enemy? But you dont think that far.
The problem isn't oh they are spying on us lets spy back its the fact we want it to be oh they are spying on us lets destroy them and spy back. DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 17:55:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Deez Nuttzy didn't read all of the threads but i did read 2/3 of them.
Lets assume the sci-fi guys in CCP got the idea for cloaking technology from star trek. well they can be tracked too by adjusting their sensors and such bu its still hard to do. So a special scan probe that worked 33% of the time might resolve that issue. Star gate same thing almost every sci-fi show had had cloaking technology in it and eventually they still were found so there should be a way.
now for real life ships and planes the US Navy and Air Force have stealth technology and we should all agree with that. That doesn't mean they are I WIN ship/planes cause there are counter measures that negate the stealth. passive radar for example - look it u - you'll see.
i don't fly a cloaked ship yet, and I am not a pvp'r too - but to make a ship with out flaws is not human and last time i checked the 4 races are all human. CCP add something to be able to scan out a cloacked ship but just don't make it to easy
So for this guy who is 23/7 and doesn't move then he will eventually get sanned and pwned but if he is truly moving around cloaked then it should be really tough to get him.
what about the 5th race?  DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 18:27:00 -
[9]
I'm still not seeing any reason that there shouldn't be a countermeasure to cloaking please come up with better arguments pro cloak lobby DOWN WITH CTRL+Q!!! |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 19:57:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Cordelia Simonova The moment cloaks can be found by scans is the moment cloaks become useless. The sole reason for having them is removed.
Cloaks and cloaked ships have enough problems as it is. Anyone who knows how to fly cloaked ships know how tricky they are to keep alive, how difficult they are to fit effectively and easy they are to detect.
Warp to a moon with a cloak on from some random location and stay there for 30 days and see how long it takes for you to get found. Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |
|

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 20:17:00 -
[11]
Originally by: James Snowscoran It's not an exploit but it's still stupid. There should be a way to find the ships if they're afk, that is avoidable if they are by the computer paying attention. One way is to make the cloaking device use inexpensive fuel that has to be reloaded into the device from time to time, kinda like a cap injector. If noone's there to turn the cloak on again after it finishes reloading the ship stays uncloaked.
I am all for the fuel.
THE FUEL!!!! Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 20:20:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Turin I think the easiest solution would be this.
Inactivity timers. If you dont hit a key into EVE in say. 1 hour, your disconnected.
This does two thingas.
Gets rid of the annoying AFK cloaker, whos only there to **** you off.
Cuts un needed connectins, thus improving lag and game quality.
You forgot to add a countermeasure to cloaks  Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 20:30:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Bawldeux IV cloaking is not an exploit staying in a system cloaked to spy on anyone is not an exploit
a covops ship is a poor poor poor POOR pvp ship, so it in itself has no advantage over your cepters, BC's....heck, it would have a tough time popping a pod
as was already posted before, use your own spies in connected systems to warn you of the incoming gank squads.
there RA, now stop whining...
yes we know but it still needs a countermeasure Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 20:57:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Falcione
Originally by: Turin I think the easiest solution would be this.
Inactivity timers. If you dont hit a key into EVE in say. 1 hour, your disconnected.
That happens to me already... I usually have to talk to someone in corp or local to stay connected. I thought this was a standard feature already.
Or is it a "feature"?
Its not a defect its a feature! Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.19 21:53:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Jezala Edited by: Jezala on 19/01/2007 21:40:19
I am completely baffled at how some people can insist on claiming that a covert ops ship, cloaked in a system, with little to no weaponry, who does nothing but sit in a system can pose such a magnificent threat to a 10-ship fleet such that it is considered to be an "I Win" button.
HUH??
Explain to me again what's so threatening about a cloaked ship that for all intents and purposes can't shoot back. And how exactly does the cloaked ship "win"?
Originally by: Zyrla Bladestorm
Exploit ? definetely not, somewhat impressive show of dedication? yep. But pretty frustrating all the same since the only "defence" vs it involves hacing a bunch of people spend 23/7 awake and staring into space where the cloaker barely spends any time at all.
The hell do you need a defense for? What's the helios going to do, scram and ransom your freighter? Christ, if RATEL is going to be such a wimp over a single cloaked ship that literally does nothing but sit in system then I should go pay a visit to their home systems.
Consider why do people but spies in alliance now consider why would people want eyes in your systems. And virtually nothing can be done to poke those eyes out Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |

Marcus TheMartin
Gallente Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.01.20 02:20:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Blue Pixie What's the whole point of Covert Ops... heck, cloak in general... if you can't do this?
You may as well say you don't like turrets ù 'cause they do damage ù and call it griefing or an exploit.
Turrets have counters you can get out of range, fly faster than their rotation speed, tracking disrupt them.
Cloaks all you have is to get within 2.5km and thats incredibly small compared to the systems that can be 158 A.U in diameter Well known fact: most facts aren't well known |
|
|
|